MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Under‐ice blooms and source‐water odour in a nutrient‐poor reservoir: biological, ecological and applied perspectives

2001· article· en· W2088598263 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Susan B. Watson, Trevor Satchwill, E. Dixon, E. McCauley

Bibliographic record

VenueFreshwater Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiomass (ecology)NutrientEcologyEnvironmental scienceEutrophicationBiologyAlgaeAbundance (ecology)PopulationAlgal bloomPhytoplankton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Algal taste and odour is usually associated with open water blooms and eutrophic systems. However, some algal species can produce high biomass under ice‐cover, even at low nutrient concentrations, that can impact water quality. This paper describes a winter odour outbreak in oligotrophic Glenmore Reservoir (Calgary, Alberta, Canada), the major algal species, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and some treatment implications. 2. Using sensory, chemical and microscope analyses, we monitored odour, algal biomass and taxa, bacteria and major nutrients. In a preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of standard water treatment with this type of algal biomass and odour, we used bench‐scale tests and sampled raw water from the Glenmore treatment plant at successive treatment stages. 3. In the winter of 1999–2000 Glenmore ice‐cover was delayed, nutrients were characteristically low (TP < ∼5 μg L –1 ), but organic carbon and bacteria were higher than in previous years. 4. During this period there was an increase in algal biomass dominated by the mixotrophic chrysoflagellate Dinobryon divergens . Temporal dynamics of this species were inversely correlated with bacteria, and biomass declined following the establishment of ice‐cover, while depth profiles showed the highest abundance at subsurface layers. This suggested that the population outbreak was triggered by high bacteria abundance but depended on a minimum amount of light, consistent with in vitro studies of other mixotrophic chrysophytes. 5. Other non‐bactiverous taxa were also numerous, notably Asterionella formosa , cryptomonads, dinoflagellates and the synurophyte Synura petersenii . 6. Raw water odour was characteristically fishy, mainly caused by the VOCs 2,4,7‐decatrienal, 2,4‐heptadienal and 2,4‐decadienal. Based on algal population and VOC dynamics, these compounds were attributed to Dinobryon . Trace amounts of 2,6‐nonadienal ( S. petersenii ) and 1,3,5 and 1,3,6‐octatriene ( A. formosa ) were also detected. It was concluded that 2,4,7‐decatrienal was the major source of the raw water odour. 7. Sensory and microscopic analyses of pre‐ and post‐treatment samples in the treatment plant indicated a complete removal of odour, but only a 30–60% removal of algal biomass and evident rupture of residual algal cells. Laboratory experiments showed that using standard treatment, chlorination rapidly oxidized 2,4,7‐decatrienal and 2,6‐nonadienal but had little effect on 2,4‐hepta‐ and decadienal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFreshwater BiologySame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207