MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088607194 · doi:10.2118/2000-096-ea

Solids Distribution in Hydrotransport Process

2000· article· en· W2088607194 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Combustion and Slurry Processing
Canadian institutionsSyncrude (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Computer scienceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Extraction process of bitumen from the oil sand ore must undergo an evolutionary change, as the mine sites farther away from the plant site must be developed in the future. At present the processes that breakup the lumps, liberate the bitumen from the sand grain and to some extent aerate the bitumen take place in the traditional rotating drum digester. As the distance between the plant site and the mine site is forced to increase, transportation of the ore by conveyor belt is not feasible and alternate technologies must be developed. Hydrotransport is one such technology in which a slurry of the ore is transported over long distance from the mine site to the extraction plant site. In the alternate technologies, the process of liberating and aerating the bitumen are to take place in the hydrotransport pipeline to some extent. While the total energy required to accomplish these steps can in principal be provided in the hydrotransport technology, and the industry is identifying the operating parameters of such a facility, it is becoming clear that the residence time of the slurry in the pipeline is significantly higher than in the traditional digester which introduces some new problems. In the proposed research, we are investigating the relationships between the solids content in the froth and the conditions (or environment) that produces the froth. We are designing a novel experimental setup in which we can control the shear environment. We plan to measure the solids content in both the bitumen and the aqueous phase as a function of controlled shear rate, the residence time of the mixture in the experimental cell, and the initial solids distribution between the aqueous and oleic phases. Introduction Traditional characterization of multiphase flows in pipelines entails, (a) mapping the flow structure (e.g. homogeneous flow, slug flow, core annular flow, bubble flow etc, (b) relating macroscopic quantities like pressure drop vs flow rate relationship as a function of flow structure, amounts of each phase, diameter and inclination of the pipe etc., (c) characterizing the microstructure of the dispersed phases (like the equilibrium size of droplets or bubbles), and (d) measuring the spatial variation of concentration of different phases (particularly for transport in the horizontal direction where density stratification can cause significant operational problems). Items (a) and (b) have been looked at in sufficient detail for two-phase flow situations while (c) and (d) have not been looked at such great details. SCOPE OF PRESENT WORK In the present work, we are focusing on the effect of shear, chemical and thermal environment on the distribution of solids (both fine and coarse solids) between the aqueous and oleic phases and on the mechanisms of bitumen liberation. There is very little information on the amount of solids engulfed by the bitumen in a shear environment, typically encountered in hydrotransport technology. Traditional multiphase flow measurements such as the pressure drop-flow rate relationships, flow maps etc of three-phase flows in pipelines are equally important, but they will be conducted under a separate NSERC strategic grant project joint with Dr. Masliyah.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it