MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088620109 · doi:10.1038/pj.2012.105

Chemical profiling of complex biochemical mixtures from various seaweeds

2012· article· en· W2088620109 on OpenAlexaff
Yasuhiro Date, Kenji Sakata, Jun Kikuchi

Bibliographic record

VenuePolymer Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSeaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsInnovation Cluster (Canada)
FundersRIKEN
KeywordsAlgaeBrown algaeChemistryBotanyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A chemical profiling methodology is described for seaweed biomass based on comprehensive characterization of the water-soluble, water-insoluble and solid-state components. For nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements of seaweed water-insoluble components, an extraction method was developed by modification and optimization of physical pretreatments and extraction processes. Compositional variations were evaluated by NMR and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and subsequently indicated red, brown and green algae-specific profiles derived from multivariate statistical analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolymer JournalSame topicSeaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsFrench-language works237,207