MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088638481 · doi:10.1097/shk.0b013e318048554a

THE HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF DOBUTAMINE DURING REOXYGENATION AFTER HYPOXIA

2007· article· en· W2088638481 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueShock · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDobutamineCardiac indexMedicineAnesthesiaCardiac outputArterial bloodHypoxia (environmental)Heart rateHemodynamicsBlood pressureCardiologyInternal medicineOxygenChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asphyxiated neonates usually have myocardial stunning and hypotension and require inotropic support. A randomized controlled study was designed to examine the dose-response effect of dobutamine (5-20 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) on systemic and regional circulations and oxygen metabolism in a neonatal swine model of hypoxia/reoxygenation. Thirty-eight anesthetized newborn piglets were acutely instrumented for continuous monitoring of heart rate, systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures, and pulmonary (surrogate for cardiac index), right common carotid, and superior mesenteric and left renal arterial flows. After stabilization, they were exposed to normocapnic alveolar hypoxia (10%-15% oxygen) for 2 h followed by reoxygenation with 100% oxygen for 1 h, then 21% for 3 h. Piglets were block randomized to receive dobutamine infusion (5, 10, or 20 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or saline (control) at 2 to 4 h of reoxygenation (n = 8 each). A nonasphyxiated, sham-operated group was included (n = 6). Blood samples were collected for blood gas analysis, arterial and venous co-oximetry, and plasma lactate concentration determination. At 2-h reoxygenation after hypoxia, there was hypotension (systemic arterial pressure, 27 to 36 mmHg) and myocardial dysfunction (cardiac index from 178-209 to 134-156 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Cardiac index improved significantly with 20 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) of dobutamine (P < 0.05) and modestly in the treatment groups of 5 and 10 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (P < 0.1) (at 120 min, 172 +/- 35, 160 +/- 30, and 158 +/- 56 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1) vs. 119 +/- 33 mL x kg(-1) x min(-1) of controls, respectively), with corresponding increases in stroke volume. Pulmonary vascular resistance was lower in all dobutamine-treated groups (vs. controls, P < 0.05) There were no differences in heart rate, systemic and pulmonary arterial pressures, systemic vascular resistance, and regional flows between groups. The group of 20 mug.kg.min of dobutamine also had higher systemic oxygen delivery (at 120 min, 18 +/- 5 vs. 11 +/- 3 O(2) mL x kg(-1) x min(-1) of controls, P < 0.05) with no significant differences in systemic oxygen consumption and regional oxygen delivery between groups. After the reoxygenation of newborn piglets with severe hypoxia, high dose of dobutamine is effective to treat myocardial stunning and low cardiac output with no significant effect on blood pressure or regional circulation. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings in the human neonate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it