MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088641614 · doi:10.1063/1.4803494

Crystal structure and optical characterization of heterostructured GaAs/AlGaAs/GaAs nanowires

2013· article· en· W2088641614 on OpenAlexafffund
Yu. A. Pusep, H. Arakaki, C. A. de Souza, Ariano De Giovanni Rodrigues, Chris Haapamaki, Ray LaPierre

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanowire Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsWurtzite crystal structurePhotoluminescenceMaterials scienceNanowireBand gapTransmission electron microscopyOptoelectronicsHeterojunctionCondensed matter physicsNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structural and optical properties of heterostructured GaAs/AlGaAs/GaAs core/inner shell/outer shell nanowires are studied. Transmission electron microscopy and Raman scattering measurements unambiguously identify the presence of segments crystallized in zincblende and wurtzite phases, which spread to the shells. Four observed photoluminescence lines are assigned to the radiative recombination of photoexcited electrons confined in the center of the GaAs core and at the heterointerface between the outer GaAs shell and the inner AlGaAs shell with the holes localized at the heterointerface between the core and the inner AlGaAs shell; both recombinations take place in zincblende and wurtzite phases. One additional photoluminescence line is attributed to the spatially indirect recombination between the electrons in zincblende and the holes in wurtzite phases. The bandgap of the wurtzite phase and the band offsets between the zincblende and wurtzite phases are determined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicNanowire Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207