MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088660157 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m004912200

Ring Opening Is Not Rate-limiting in the GTP Cyclohydrolase I Reaction

2001· article· en· W2088660157 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicholas Schramek, Andreas Bracher, Adelbert Bacher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHans-Fischer-GesellschaftDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsGTP'FormateChemistryRing (chemistry)Amino acidEscherichia coliEnzymeStereochemistryBiochemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GTP cyclohydrolase I catalyzes a mechanistically complex ring expansion affording dihydroneopterin triphosphate and formate from GTP. Single turnover quenched flow experiments were performed with the recombinant enzyme from Escherichia coli. The consumption of GTP and the formation of 5-formylamino-6-ribosylamino-2-amino-4(3H)-pyrimidinone triphosphate, formate, and dihydroneopterin triphosphate were determined by high pressure liquid chromatography analysis. A kinetic model comprising three consecutive unimolecular steps was used for interpretations where the first intermediate, 5-formylamino-6-ribosylamino-2-amino-4(3H)-pyrimidinone 5'-triphosphate, was formed in a reversible reaction. The rate constant k(1) for the reversible opening of the imidazole ring of GTP was 0.9 s(-1), the rate constant k(3) for the release of formate from 5-formylamino-6-ribosylamino-2-amino-4(3H)-pyrimidinone triphosphate was 2.0 s(-1), and the rate constant k(4) for the formation of dihydroneopterin triphosphate was 0.03 s(-1). Thus, the hydrolytic opening of the imidazole ring of GTP is rapid by comparison with the overall reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicMetabolism and Genetic DisordersFrench-language works237,207