MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088719338 · doi:10.1021/ma021021b

Polystyrene-<i>b</i><i>lock</i>-polyisoprene Nanofiber Fractions. 1. Preparation and Static Light-Scattering Study

2002· article· en· W2088719338 on OpenAlexaff
Guojun Liu, Xiaohu Yan, Scott Duncan

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicBlock Copolymer Self-Assembly
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanofiberRadius of gyrationMolar massPolystyreneDynamic light scatteringPolymerStatic light scatteringHydrodynamic radiusMultiangle light scatteringPolymer chemistryMaterials scienceLight scatteringGyrationMolar mass distributionScatteringCopolymerTransmission electron microscopyChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Composite materialNanoparticleNanotechnologyChromatographyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Block copolymer nanofibers may be viewed as the macroscopic counterparts of polymer chains or supra−polymer chains. Well-characterized nanofiber fractions with narrow length distributions are required to facilitate their study by techniques such as viscometry and dynamic light scattering. Polystyrene- block -polyisoprene (PS- b -PI) nanofibers were prepared in this study by stirring S 2 Cl 2 -treated PS- b -PI films in THF to separate and disperse the cross-linked PI cylindrical domains. Nanofiber fractions were obtained by combining centrifugation fractionation and ultrasonication. These fractions were characterized by transmission electron microscopy to obtain their length distribution functions and static light scattering to yield the weight-average molar masses and z -average radii of gyration. A quantitative analysis of the radius of gyration values revealed that the PS- b -PI nanofibers had a persistence length of ∼200 nm in THF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicBlock Copolymer Self-AssemblyFrench-language works237,207