MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088735467 · doi:10.1080/09540260500050016

Shadows of culture in psychosis in south India: A methodological exploration and illustration

2005· article· en· W2088735467 on OpenAlexaff
Ellen Corin, R. Thara, R. Padmavati

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of Psychiatry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University InstituteDouglas College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeVisionPsychologyConvergence (economics)Divergence (linguistics)ConcordanceSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychosisSocial psychologyDevelopmental psychologySociologyAnthropologyMedicinePsychiatryArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transcultural studies suggest a possible influence of culture on the course and outcome of schizophrenia. However, the notion of culture remains ill-defined in these studies; most often, hypotheses regarding protective factors seem to derive more from stereotyped visions of cultural differences than be empirically based. Explorative studies conducted in south India consider subjective experience as a key mediating variable between culture and course and outcome in schizophrenia. They explore patients and relatives experience and its evolution and aim at identifying the explicit and implicit references to culture throughout the narratives. Ethnographically oriented data collected through an open-ended Turning Point/Period Interview systematically reconstructs the perceived evolution of signs, coping, explanations, reactions and help-seeking from different perspectives. This paper examines the degree of convergence and divergence between narratives collected from a small sample of female schizophrenic patients and one of their relatives. A high degree of convergence at the level of symptoms and differences in their narrative construction are observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Review of PsychiatrySame topicMental Health Treatment and AccessFrench-language works237,207