MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088736807 · doi:10.1159/000127266

Dissociated Adult Rat Subfornical Organ Neurons Maintain Membrane Properties and Angiotensin Responsiveness for up to 6 Days

2008· article· en· W2088736807 on OpenAlexaff
Alastair V. Ferguson, John Bicknell, Mark A. Carew, William T. Mason

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubfornical organTetrodotoxinMembrane potentialElectrophysiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyAngiotensin IICurrent clampPatch clampReversal potentialChemistryVoltage clampSodium channelBiophysicsNeuroscienceIn vivoSodiumMedicineBiologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have utilised standard dissociation techniques to obtain a preparation of subfornical organ (SFO) cells that have been maintained in tissue culture for up to 1 week. Stable (> 15 min) whole cell recordings were obtained from 80 cells displaying rapid (<2 ms) voltage-dependent sodium currents (blocked by tetrodotoxin in 10 of 10 cells tested), and current evoked action potentials, which were thus classified as SFO neurons. These neurons had a resting membrane potential of-63.8 +/- 1.3 mV (mean +/- SEM), spike amplitude of 86.8 +/- 2.5 mV, and input resistance of 1.2 +/- 0.1 G omega, characteristics which did not change significantly in recordings obtained for up to 6 days after dissociation. Current clamp recording showed that of 65 cells tested with bath application of angiotensin (ANG; 1,000-10nM), 41 responded to this peptide with decreases in input resistance (control 1.4 +/- 0.16 G omega, after ANG 0.78 +/- 0.1 G omega, p < 0.0001), and depolarisations (mean 18.3 +/- 2.0 mV, p < 0.0001). Similar recordings were obtained from viable cells up to 6 days after initial cell dissociation. These studies provide the first description of the basic membrane properties of dissociated SFO neurons. The responsiveness of these cells to ANG supports the conclusion that their properties are similar to those in vivo. These data suggest that use of this technique will permit systematic analysis of the membrane events underlying the actions of multiple ligands on this uniquely specialised group of CNS neurons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.820

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207