MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088742152 · doi:10.1190/1.1438500

Interview with Mike Forrest, “father of bright spots” and “oil finder” at Shell Oil

2000· article· en· W2088742152 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dolores Proubasta

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOfficerVice presidentManagementPetroleum industryCorporationEngineeringGeologyOperations researchHistoryPolitical scienceArchaeologyLawPaleontologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Michael C. Forrest, commonly known as “the father of bright spots,” was interviewed by Dolores Proubasta during Calgary 2000 as part of a continuing “Mentoring” series of articles. Forrest started work with Shell in 1955 as a geophysicist, followed by assignments as seismic party chief and offshore Gulf of Mexico geophysical project leader. In the Gulf's Louisiana shelf, Forrest played a major role in several 100-million-barrel Shell discoveries in the early to mid-1970s using “bright spot” seismic technology. In the mid 1980s he was part of the management team that leased many Gulf deepwater (2000 to 6000 ft) prospects now in production. He completed his Shell career as president of Pecten International Company (a Shell USA subsidiary).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207