MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Conception to Harmonization: Barriers in International Competitiveness Research

2015· article· en· W2088770726 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carolan McLarney, Edward K. Chung

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Commerce and Management Thought · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonizationRanking (information retrieval)Competition (biology)JurisdictionInternational tradeCompetitive advantageRegional scienceBusinessEconomyEconomicsPolitical scienceGeographyMarketingComputer scienceLawArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The International competitiveness as per WCR is the ability of a country or a company to proportionally generate more wealth than its competition in the world market. The Davos World Economic Forum since 1981 has been creating the best known competitive indexes in the World Competitive Report (WCR). This paper has focused on problems that exist in trying to produce statistics, competitive indexes including ranking for Atlantic Canada that could allow the region to be compound with state jurisdiction in US and with a number of countries and territories around the world. While intent was to classify and describe these problems, some observations on statistics and their harmonization can be made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.051
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.052
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0510.052
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0080.090
Scholarly communication0.0260.032
Open science0.0030.014
Research integrity0.0050.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Commerce and Management ThoughtSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207