MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Contractor Selection Using an Integrated AHP and TOPSIS Model

2013· article· en· W2088771538 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Othoman Elsayah, Naren Gupta, Binsheng Zhang, Sam Wamuziri

Bibliographic record

VenueImplementation of the Inuvialuit Final Agreement, annual review · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMulti-Criteria Decision Making
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTOPSISAnalytic hierarchy processSelection (genetic algorithm)Computer scienceOperations researchModel selectionEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Merchiston Campus, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK The High Centre for comprehensive careers and prepares trainers, Civil Engineering Department Sabha, Libya, P. O. Box 19280 Email: O.Elsayah@napier.ac.uk (Corresponding Author) Naren Gupta School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Merchiston Campus, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK Email: N.Gupta@napier.ac.uk Binsheng Zhang School of Engineering and the Built Environment, Merchiston Campus, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK Email: B.Zhang@napier.ac.uk Sam Wamuziri University Management Research Centre, Glyndŵr University, Wrexham Mold Road, Wrexham LL11 2AW, Wales, UK Email: S.Wamuziri@glyndwr.ac.uk ABSTRACT

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0070.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.293
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImplementation of the Inuvialuit Final Agreement, annual reviewSame topicMulti-Criteria Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207