Diagnostic utility of molecular and cytogenetic analysis in lipoblastoma: a study of two cases and review of the literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Lipoblastoma is a benign neoplasm of embryonic white fat tissue that results from the proliferation of primitive adipocytes, in which histological features can be ambiguous. In order to discriminate between lipoblastoma and other lipogenic and lipomatous tumours, we studied chromosomal alterations and protein expression in two cases of lipoblastoma in infants. METHODS AND RESULTS: Standard cytogenetic analysis, fluorescence in-situ hybridization, array comparative genomic hybridization and Western blotting allowed us to demonstrate the presence of chromosome abnormalities involving the 8q11-13 region containing the pleomorphic adenoma gene 1 (PLAG1), which are classically reported in lipoblastoma, and aberrant expression of PLAG1. CONCLUSIONS: This report illustrates two different tumorigenic pathways implicating PLAG1 in lipoblastoma: amplification through multiple copies of a small marker chromosome derived from chromosome 8, and a paracentric inversion of the long arm of chromosome 8. Both these anomalies induced aberrant expression of PLAG1, emphasizing the role of PLAG1 in tumorigenesis. The aberrant expression of PLAG1 protein has been hypothesized, but this is the first report to demonstrate its occurrence in lipoblastoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".