MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088783667 · doi:10.5589/m12-057

Shrub characterization using terrestrial laser scanning and implications for airborne LiDAR assessment

2013· article· en· W2088783667 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lee A. Vierling, Yanyin Xu, Jan U.H. Eitel, John S. Oldow

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLidarShrubRemote sensingGeographyLaser scanningCharacterization (materials science)Environmental scienceEcologyLaserBiologyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractSagebrush-steppe ecosystems across the United States Intermountain West are experiencing major structural and functional changes. Scientists and managers need effective technologies to understand such dynamic changes across broad spatial scales. We tested the capacity of terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) to automatically determine structural information of individual shrubs (principally Artemisia tridentata) and shrub canopies in eastern Washington, USA. Because current airborne LiDAR systems have technological constraints that may limit their utility in shrub-dominated ecosystems, we used the TLS data both in their basic form and to simulate high resolution discrete-return airborne LiDAR data with sample densities of 4 and 16 points m−2. Through spatial wavelet analysis we automatically detected the locations of up to 78% of all individual shrubs identified in the field and up to 88% of shrubs with a crown diameter > 1.5 m. Shrub height and canopy cover derived from TLS data were significantly correlated with field measurements (respectively, r2 = 0.94 and 0.51, p < 0.001, α = 0.05). Automated detection of individual shrub crown area using the high resolution simulated airborne LiDAR dataset was also significantly correlated with field measurements (r2 = 0.47, p ≤ 0.01). Our results indicate that TLS data are useful for automatic quantification of shrub structure and provide a glimpse to the utility of the next generation of small-footprint airborne LiDAR instruments in quantifying shrub biophysical parameters across broad areas.Les écosystèmes de steppe à armoise sur l'ensemble de la région Intramontagneuse ouest des États-Unis sont soumis à des changements structurels et fonctionnels importants. Les scientifiques et les gestionnaires ont ainsi besoin de technologies efficaces pour comprendre de tels changements dynamiques à travers des échelles spatiales variées. On a testé le potentiel des données SLT (scanner laser terrestre) pour déterminer automatiquement l'information structurelle des arbustes individuels (principalement Artemisia tridentata) et des couverts d'arbustes dans l'est de l'état de Washington, aux États-Unis. Étant donné que les systèmes LiDAR aéroporté actuels présentent des contraintes technologiques qui peuvent limiter leur utilité dans les écosystèmes dominés par des arbustes, on a utilisé des données SLT dans leur forme initiale de même que pour simuler des données LiDAR aéroporté haute résolution à retour discret avec des densités d'échantillonnage de 4 et de 16 points m−2. Par le biais d'une analyse spatiale en ondelettes, on a détecté automatiquement la localisation de plus de 78% de tous les arbustes individuels identifiés sur le terrain et de plus de 88% des arbustes avec un diamètre de couronne > 1,5 m. La hauteur des arbustes et le couvert dérivés des données SLT étaient corrélés significativement avec les mesures au sol (r2 = 0,94 et 0,51, p < 0,001, α = 0,05 respectivement). La détection automatisée de la surface de la couronne des arbustes individuels utilisant l'ensemble des données simulées LiDAR aéroporté haute résolution était également significativement corrélée avec les mesures au sol (r2 = 0,47, p ≤ 0,01). Nos résultats montrent que les données SLT sont utiles pour la quantification automatique de la structure des arbustes et que celles-ci donnent un aperçu du potentiel de la prochaine génération d'instruments LiDAR aéroporté à faible empreinte pour la quantification des paramètres biophysiques des arbustes sur de grands espaces.[Traduit par la Rédaction] AcknowledgementsThe total station was generously loaned by A. Abdel-Rahim. We thank J. Cline, P. Shilpakar, A. Biholar, and N. Turinski for field and laboratory assistance. S. Bunting, A. Hudak, S. Martinuzzi, R. Robberecht, A. Smith, J. Hicke, K. Vierling, M. Wulder, H. Zhou, and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful discussions and comments that strengthened earlier versions of the manuscript. Partial funding for this project was provided by the University of Idaho Harold Heady Professorship in Rangeland Ecology, and Bureau of Land Management grant L08AC14585.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207