MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088786454 · doi:10.1109/isscc.2013.6487761

An LTE transmitter using a class-A/B power mixer

2013· article· en· W2088786454 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmitterTransceiverAmplifierBandwidth (computing)Computer sciencePower (physics)Electrical engineeringPower budgetTelecommunicationsEnergy consumptionPower consumptionWirelessChannel (broadcasting)Transmitter power outputElectronic engineeringEngineeringPower controlPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For an LTE transceiver it is quite challenging to reduce power and area while preserving performance. For large emitted signals the TX dominates power consumption but in the past this situation was sufficiently infrequent not to affect energy consumption. In recent times the statistical distribution of the TX power has shifted upward due to the use of data-intensive communications and the introduction of multi-gain power amplifiers. Therefore to extend battery life in fourth generation terminals, TX consumption at high power (>-10dBm) should be reduced. A second challenge of an FDD LTE TX is noise and distortion emission in the RX band since the TX-to-RX distance, relative to the channel bandwidth, can be much smaller than in previous standards [1].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207