Adiponectin Increases LPL Activity via RhoA/ROCK-Mediated Actin Remodelling in Adult Rat Cardiomyocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiomyocyte substrate utilization is important in maintaining optimal cardiac function. Adiponectin has been shown to confer cardioprotective effects in part via regulating glucose and fatty acid uptake and oxidation in cardiomyocytes. Here we investigated mechanisms whereby adiponectin mediates a particular metabolic effect by focusing on lipoprotein lipase (LPL), an enzyme that increases free fatty acid availability to the heart by breakdown of chylomicrons and very-low-density lipoproteins in circulation. We used primary adult rat cardiomyocytes and demonstrate that adiponectin increased LPL translocation to the cell surface where it could be released at least partly in its active form, as evidenced by measuring basal and heparin-releasable LPL activity. Furthermore, these effects of adiponectin were mediated via remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton. We quantitatively assessed the filamentous to globular actin ratio and show that increased stress fiber formation, visualized by rhodamine-phalloidin immunofluorescence, in response to adiponectin, is achieved via stimulating Ras homolog gene family A (RhoA) activity, determined using G-LISA RhoA activation assay kit. We also demonstrate that adiponectin induces phosphorylation and inhibition of cofilin, leading to a reduction in actin treadmilling. Increased cofilin phosphorylation and stress fiber formation in response to adiponectin were prevented by inhibition of either RhoA or its downstream kinase Rho-associated protein kinase. Importantly, inhibition of cytoskeletal remodeling prevented adiponectin-stimulated plasma membrane LPL content detected by immunofluorescence and also subsequent LPL activity. In summary, we show that adiponectin mediates actin cytoskeleton remodeling to translocate LPL and allow subsequent activation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".