Optimal design of synchronous circuits using software pipelining techniques
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a method to optimize clocked circuits by relocating and changing the time of activation of registers to maximize the throughput. Our method is based on a modulo scheduling algorithm for software pipelining, instead of retiming. It optimizes the circuit without the constraint on the clock phases that retiming has, which permits to always achieve the optimal clock period. The two methods have the same overall time complexity, but we avoid the computation of all pair-shortest paths, which is a heavy burden regarding both space and time. From the optimal schedule found, registers are placed in the circuit without looking at where the original registers were. The resulting circuit is a multi-phase clocked circuit, where all the clocks have the same period and the phases are automatically determined by the algorithm. Edge-triggered flip-flops are used where the combinational delays exactly match that period, whereas level-sensitive latches are used elsewhere, improving the area occupied by the circuit. Experiments on existing and newly developed benchmarks show a substantial performance improvement compared to previously published work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it