MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088835398 · doi:10.1056/nejmp020082

Ventilation with Small Tidal Volumes

2002· letter· en· W2088835398 on OpenAlexaff
Arthur S. Slutsky, Jeffrey M. Drazen

Bibliographic record

VenueNew England Journal of Medicine · 2002
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDead spaceTidal volumeVentilation (architecture)MedicineVolume (thermodynamics)RespirationCarbon dioxideRespiratory minute volumeMechanicsRespiratory systemPhysiologyAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyEcologyThermodynamicsInternal medicineAnatomyPhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human survival depends on the exchange of fresh air with carbon dioxide in the blood. Since this exchange takes place in the alveoli, one of the first concepts taught in respiratory physiology is that the size of each breath, the tidal volume, must exceed the volume of the conducting airways, also known as the dead space. However, this construct is not strictly accurate, since we know that adequate gas exchange can be achieved when tidal volumes smaller than that of the dead space are taken in at sufficiently high frequencies, a technique termed high-frequency ventilation.How can we survive if . . .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations122
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNew England Journal of MedicineSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207