MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088854567 · doi:10.1109/rws.2010.5434142

BER performance assessment of linearized MIMO transmitters in presence of RF crosstalk

2010· article· en· W2088854567 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredistortionTransmitterMIMOCrosstalkLinearizationBit error rateElectronic engineeringNonlinear systemComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)EngineeringTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)PhysicsAmplifier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the effect of nonlinear crosstalk on the overall performance of the MIMO transmitter. It proposes a linearization technique to correct for the effect of crosstalk and hence enhance the BER performance of the MIMO system. Recently it was shown that in the presence of nonlinear crosstalk, the conventional digital predistortion technique is unable to linearize the transmitter, which leads to significant degradation in bit-error-rate of the MIMO system. In this regard, a new digital predistortion method known as crossover digital predistorter (CO-DPD) is developed and implemented. The simulation results show that the CO-DPD model is able to both compensate for the transmitter nonlinearity and achieve BER results close to the ideal MIMO transmitter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Power Amplifier DesignFrench-language works237,207