Decomposition of residues and loss of the δ-endotoxin from transgenic (<i>Bt</i>) corn (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) in soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Corn and other crops genetically modified to express the insecticidal δ-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) are grown widely across north America. Studies have shown that the δ -endotoxin can be stabilised on soil colloids where its activity is retained, but reports of direct ecological effects of the δ-endotoxin on soil processes are limited. We have determined the concentrations of the δ-endotoxin in organic residues fro m Bt-corn plants at increasing stages of ageing and decay, and the subsequent decomposition in soil of these residues and the δ-endotoxin in them. The δ-endotoxin concentrations declined from 6.8 μg g-1 in the fresh plant material, to 0.82 μg g-1 in the post-harvest residues collected in the fall, and to 0.026 μg g-1 in the residues collected from soil surface the following spring. The concentration of δ -endotoxin in buried residues collected in the spring was not significantly different from zero. When incubated in soil in the laboratory over 84 d, the δ-endotoxin decomposed more rapidly than bulk plant C by factors of 1.85 for the fresh plant materials and 3.21 for the post-harvest residues. Within 14 d of incubation, the δ-endotoxin concentration in the residues collected at the soil surface was below the limit of detection. We contrasted the laboratory decomposition data with data from a field experiment to estimate the period that the δ-endotoxin in corn residues may survive in the field. Based on estimates derived from this comparison, we predict that following an October harvest in eastern Ontario the δ-endotoxin would fall below the detection threshold during November for post-harvest residues. Since stabilisation of the δ-endotoxin on soil colloids depends on it surviving (i.e., not being decomposed) for long enough to be released from the plant residue matrix and come into proximity with colloid surfaces, the rapid decay of the δ-endotoxin suggests that only a small fraction of the δ-endotoxin from post-harvest residues persists long enough to become stabilised in the field. Key words: Bt, corn, crop residue decomposition, maize
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".