MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088911975 · doi:10.1680/grim.2006.10.2.47

Back-calculating vibro-installation stresses in stone-column-reinforced soils

2006· article· en· W2088911975 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground Improvement · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSettlement (finance)Geotechnical engineeringStress (linguistics)GeologySoil waterSoil scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An investigation was carried out to study the effect of the vibro-installation of stone columns on the soil state of stress. Post-installation soil parameters and load-settlement records were utilised to back-calculate the ratio of horizontal to vertical soil stress, K*. The load-settlement records were taken from a full-scale field load test, carried out on a single column within an extended group of stone columns. A coupled non-linear finite element formulation was utilised to simulate the test steps and the relevant settlement rate criterion. Post-installation soil parameters were adopted in the simulation in order to account for any vibration- and/or displacement-induced changes in the soil properties. The investigation revealed that the vibro-installation of stone columns significantly alters the soil state of stress. A practical range for the post-installation lateral earth pressure ratio, K*, in the analysed case was deduced. Nous avons étudié les effets de la vibro-installation de colonnes de pierres sur l'état de contrainte du sol. Des paramètres de sol après installation et des données chargetassement ont é té utilisés pour rétro calculer le rapport entre la contrainte de sol horizontale et la contrainte de sol verticale, K*. Les données charge-tassement viennent d'un essai grandeur nature sur le terrain, chargement effectué sur une seule colonne dans un groupe étendu de colonnes de pierre. Nous avons utilisé une formulation couplée d'élément fini non linéaire pour simuler les é tapes du test et le critère de taux de tassement correspondant. Les paramètres de sol après installation ont é té adoptés dans la simulation afin de prendre en compte tout changement dans les propriétés du sol provoqué par la vibration et/ou le déplacement. L'étude a ré vélé que la vibro-installation de colonnes de pierre changeait de manière significative l'état de contrainte du sol. Nous en avons déduit une fourchette pratique pour le taux de pression terrestre latérale après installation, K*, dans le cas analysé

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it