L’alternance C/Ø des verbes français : une analyse par contraintes et stratégies de réparation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’alternance C(onsonne)/Ø en français, notamment dans la flexion verbale, est souvent causée par des violations de contraintes phonologiques. Les consonnes latentes sont analysées ici comme des consonnes flottantes - des consonnes malformées en forme sous-jacente parce sans unité de temps - qui violent le « principe de légitimation » selon lequel toute unité phonologique doit être incorporée dans une structure complète. Selon le contexte phonologique/ morphologique, une violation peut être « réparée » par l’élision de la consonne flottante ou l’insertion d’une unité de temps, d’où résulte partiellement l’alternance C/Ø. Contrairement aux traditionnels groupes verbaux, la distinction entre « radical à consonne flottante » et « radical à consonne permanente » permet de prédire la sélection de suffixes infinitifs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".