MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088937447 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.42.6.1886

Introduction to Ore-Forming Processes.: By Laurence Robb. Blackwell Publishing, 108 Cowley Road, Oxford 0X4 1JF, UK, 2004, 373 p. 400 ZAR Paperback (ISBN 0632063785).

2004· article· en· W2088937447 on OpenAlexaffvenue
David J. Mossman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPublishingClass (philosophy)Unit (ring theory)GeochemistryLibrary scienceMathematics educationPolitical sciencePhilosophyPsychologyLawComputer scienceEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Here at last is a first-class senior undergraduate – postgraduate textbook focused on the spectrum of geological processes involved in the genesis of ore deposits. Professor of Economic Geology at the University of the Witwatersrand, and Director of its Economic Geology Research Unit, Laurence

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1260.079

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207