Interpersonal Competence and Daily Stress Generation in Individuals with Avoidant Personality Disorder Symptoms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stress generation research has historically examined the link between depression and stressful life events, particularly interpersonal events. Stress generation theory has rarely been applied to personality disorders, which are characterized by longstanding, pervasive, and often self-perpetuating interpersonal difficulties. In addition, there is little research on the specific types of interpersonal deficits associated with personality disorders. We examined the associations between symptoms of Avoidant Personality Disorder (AVPD), interpersonal competence, and daily stress generation. College students completed measures of personality disorder symptoms, interpersonal competence, and a 7-day diary of daily negative events. Multilevel mediation models showed that lower Conflict Management skills mediated the relation between AVPD symptoms and daily negative events. These results suggest that a daily model of stress generation might apply to these personality disorder symptoms and that interpersonal competence is an important mediator of the process of daily stress generation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it