MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2088977633 · doi:10.1081/erc-200044014

Cellular Specific Expression of the Androgen‐Conjugating Enzymes UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 in the Human Prostate Epithelium

2004· article· en· W2088977633 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarah Chouinard, Georges Pelletier, Alain Bélanger, Olivier Barbier

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrine Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsDihydrotestosteroneAndrosteroneTestosterone (patch)AndrogenDehydroepiandrosteroneAndrostenedioneEndocrinologyInternal medicineEnzymeProstateBiologyChemistrySteroidBiochemistryMedicineHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In humans, 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3beta-HSD), 17beta-HSD, and 5alpha-reductase enzymes convert dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), androstenedione, and testosterone into the most potent natural androgen dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in the prostate. This androgen is transformed mainly in situ to two Phase I metabolites, androsterone (ADT) and androstane-3alpha,17beta-diol (3alpha-DIOL), which can, however, be back-converted to DHT. Here, we report recent findings on the characterization of specific anti-UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) 2B15 and 2B17 antibodies and their use to identify UGT2B expressing-cells in the human prostate epithelium. We found that UGT2B17 is expressed in basal cells where DHEA is converted into 3alpha-DIOL and ADT. By contrast, the expression of UGT2B 15 was observed only in luminal cells, where DHT is formed from testosterone. These results demonstrate that, in the human prostate, UGT2B15 and UGT2B17 genes have complementary roles, and are expressed in cells where their specific substrates are synthesized. This reinforces the hypothesis that UGT enzymes catalyze an important mechanism for modulating the action of steroids and protecting the steroid-sensitive tissues from deleteriously high steroid concentrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndocrine ResearchSame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207