Une constance à la chinoise : Considérations sur l’art performatif extrême chinois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se propose de rendre compte de l’évolution fulgurante de l’art performatif chinois à partir du début des années 90 jusqu’au début des années 2000, période relativement brève mais qui en constitue sans doute l’apogée. La radicalité et le caractère extrêmement controversé de certaines des performances discutées ici nous amène à nous questionner sur ce qui différencie les performances qui se présentent comme expression d’un malaise politico-existentiel et celles qui agissent comme acting-out d’une logique biopolitique. Notre travail s’articulera autour des questions suivantes : quels sont les enjeux impliqués dans l’expositionperformative d’une conduite humaine? Ou dans une optique plus biopolitique : que signifie exposer/dis-play (de) l’humain? Cette réflexion sur l’art performatif en Chine dans une optique biopolitique et anthropogénétique s’appuiera principalement sur les œuvres de Yang Zhichao, He Yunchang, Zhang Huan, Peng Yu, Sun Yuan et Zhu Yu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".