MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089021270 · doi:10.1139/z00-003

Changes in coyote activity patterns due to reduced exposure to human persecution

2000· article· en· W2089021270 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ann M. Kitchen, Eric M. Gese, Edward R. Schauster

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Wildlife Research CenterAnimal and Plant Health Inspection ServiceU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceUtah State UniversityU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsPredationBiologyDisturbance (geology)PopulationCanisEcologyNocturnalAnimal scienceDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Activity patterns in animals are influenced by a number of factors, including the animal's physiological adaptations, prey availability and distribution, and disturbances caused by predators and humans. We compared coyote (Canis latrans) activity patterns estimated using radio-tracking locations between 1983 and 1988 with those documented between 1996 and 1997 on the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site, in southeastern Colorado. We tested the hypothesis that changes in the type of disturbance experienced by coyotes would result in changes in their activity patterns. Disturbance experienced by the coyote population studied during 1983-1988, included >50 years of intense exploitation (shooting and trapping by ranchers) and intensive removal efforts using aerial gunning. In contrast, coyotes tracked during 1996-1997 experienced some periodic disturbance from army maneuvers occurring in the area, but were not exposed to any direct form of persecution (e.g., shooting). From August 1983 to July 1988, 49 coyotes (26 males and 23 females) were tracked for >2400 h using radiotelemetry. From April 1996 to August 1997, 22 coyotes (12 males and 10 females) were tracked for >950 h. The average rate of diurnal movement of the coyotes in the 1996-1997 field study (mean = 0.97 km/h) was significantly higher than that of the coyotes in the 1983-1988 field study (mean = 0.68 km/h). This occurred despite no significant increase in the overall (24 h) rate of movement between the two field studies. Estimates of prey use by the coyotes in both field studies were obtained, to test an alternate hypothesis that prey switching might explain the changes in coyote movement patterns. However, there was no significant difference between the frequency of occurrence of diurnally versus nocturnally active mammalian prey species in the diets of coyotes in any season or overall between the 1983-1988 and 1996-1997 field studies. This study demonstrated that coyote activity patterns can be influenced by the type of disturbance experienced by the animal. A coyote population that had historically been exposed to human persecution shifted to higher levels of diurnal activity when exploitation ceased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations175
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207