Intraspinal Synovial Cyst Communicating With the C1-C2 Facet Joints and Subarachnoid Space Associated With Rheumatoid Atlantoaxial Instability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: The first case of intraspinal synovial cyst communicating with the C1-C2 facet joints and subarachnoid space associated with rheumatoid atlantoaxial instability is presented. OBJECTIVES: To describe the diagnosis and successful treatment of a synovial cyst of the C1-C2 junction in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and atlantoaxial instability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Intraspinal synovial cysts of the C1-C2 junction are extremely rare. Neither association with rheumatoid atlantoaxial instability nor communication with the C1-C2 facet joints and the subarachnoid space has been previously reported in a synovial cyst of the C1-C2 junction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical and radiologic features of a 71-year-old woman with a symptomatic synovial cyst of the C1-C2 junction with rheumatoid atlantoaxial instability are detailed. Posterior atlantoaxial fusion alone was performed. RESULTS: Preoperative magnetic resonance images demonstrated a large cystic mass around the dens, compressing the spinal cord. The mass was of low signal intensity on T1-weighted images, was of high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, and was enhanced marginally with gadolinium-DTPA on T1-weighted images. Computed tomograms performed after myelography disclosed the cyst around the dens communicating with the subarachnoid space and the C1-C2 facet joints. Spontaneous regression of the cyst was identified on the magnetic resonance images 3 months after surgery. One year after surgery, myelopathic symptoms were improved. CONCLUSION: An intraspinal cyst communicating with the C1-C2 facet joints and subarachnoid space associated with rheumatoid atlantoaxial instability was reported. Computed tomograms after myelography were useful in delineating the relationships among the synovial cyst, facet joints, and the subarachnoid space. Spontaneous regression of the cyst and clinical improvement were achieved by C1-C2 posterior fusion alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".