MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089047137 · doi:10.1145/1785481.1785581

Performance-constrained template-driven retargeting for analog and RF layouts

2010· article· en· W2089047137 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng Liu, Lihong Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVLSI and FPGA Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParasitic extractionRetargetingComputer scienceIntegrated circuit layoutNetlistRadio frequencyRLC circuitElectronic engineeringIC layout editorPage layoutInteger programmingCircuit extractionComputer engineeringAlgorithmIntegrated circuitEngineeringEquivalent circuitComputer hardwareCapacitorArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Performance of analog and RF integrated circuits is highly sensitive to layout parasitics. This paper presents a complete template-driven algorithm that automatically conducts performance-constrained parasitic-aware retargeting and optimization for analog and RF layouts. In order to ensure desired circuit performance even at high frequency, a lumped interconnect RLC model is deployed and geometric expressions of inductive parasitics are incorporated into optimization. Piecewise performance sensitivities with respect to layout parasitics are determined. Then the algorithm applies numeric performance sensitivities to control parasitic-related layout geometries by constructing performance constraints. The formulated problem is finally solved using a graph-based technique and mixed-integer nonlinear programming. The proposed method has been incorporated into a parasitic-aware automatic layout optimization and retargeting tool. It has been demonstrated to be effective and efficient especially when adapting layout design for new technologies or updated specifications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and FPGA Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207