Ultra‐relativistic acceleration of electrons in planetary magnetospheres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a new particle acceleration mechanism called ultra‐relativistic acceleration (URA). URA comprises electron energization due to a special form of nonlinear phase trapping by a coherent whistler‐mode wave for electrons with an initial Lorentz factor γ0 satisfying γ0 > ΩEQ/ω; ω is the wave frequency and ΩEQ is the electron cyclotron frequency at the equator of an assumed dipole magnetic field. Radiation belt electrons that encounter a combination of relativistic turning acceleration (RTA) followed by multiple URA interactions can undergo significant energy increase. Under ideal conditions, at Earth (L = 4) several‐hundred‐keV electrons can be energized to several MeV within a few seconds, while at Jupiter (L = 8), several‐hundred‐keV electrons can be energized by tens of MeV in a few tens of seconds. URA can play a prominent role in generating the several‐MeV electrons observed in Earth's outer zone and the tens‐of‐MeV electrons observed in Jupiter's magnetosphere. More generally, we expect URA to be an effective electron energization mechanism in cosmic plasma environments that contain a magnetic mirror geometry and electromagnetic whistler‐mode emissions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".