Biomechanical Stability of Intramedullary Nailed High Proximal Third Tibial Fractures With Cement Augmented Proximal Screws
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Intramedullary nailing of nonarticular proximal tibia fractures can be affected by bone density resulting in loss of stability, fixation, and malalignment in osteopenic bone. This study was designed to quantify the biomechanical effects of augmenting proximal screws with cement in intramedullary nailing of high proximal third tibial fractures. DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical study using anatomic specimens. METHODS: Reamed nails were inserted into seven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric proximal tibiae and secured using two oblique and two transverse proximal screws. Paired tibiae were randomly assigned into two groups: cemented and noncemented proximal screw-holes. Bone cement was injected into the screw-holes before screw insertion in the cemented tibiae. Specimens were then tested in flexion/extension and varus/valgus to 12 Nm and in torsion to 7 Nm. Physical measurements of bone density were obtained to determine the effect of density on stability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stability of the construct in both groups was analyzed and compared statistically using paired t tests. RESULTS: Cement augmentation of the proximal screws significantly increased mechanical stability in torsion and varus/valgus load configurations, with average decreases in rotational motion of 5.4 degrees +/- 1.6 degrees and 5.1 degrees +/- 5 degrees respectively. No change in stability was observed in flexion/extension loading. A trend toward decreased stability was seen in the uncemented construct in varus/valgus; cement augmentation of the proximal screws eliminated this effect. CONCLUSIONS: Lower bone density decreased the stability of the uncemented construct; however, cement augmentation of the proximal screws showed a trend to eliminate this effect in the varus/valgus loading configuration and should be considered when nailing proximal third tibial fractures in osteoporotic patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".