The use of tangent stiffness to characterize the resilient response of unbound crushed aggregates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Repeated-load triaxial tests were conducted on crushed granitic base-course material to study the resilient response under different stress paths and compaction states. It has been established that the resilient response of this prestrained unbound granular material is best defined in terms of tangent stiffness (Et) and vertical stress (σv). The data also revealed the existence of a threshold value of tangent stiffness that is essentially dependent on initial confining stress for a given compaction state. When the tangent modulus exceeds this threshold value, a unique relationship between tangent stiffness and vertical stress exists for mobilized shear resistance ratios less than 0.4. This Et–σv relationship is independent of stress path. A simple power law model can be used to predict the resilient response of unbound base-course material and an approximate value of resilient modulus for any desired stress path and initial stress condition. The use of the tangent stiffness – vertical stress model for pavement design appears to be very promising.Key words: granular, material, resilient modulus, triaxial, stress path.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".