MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089144974 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2008.2006584

Constrained Adaptive Echo Cancellation for Discrete Multitone Systems

2008· article· en· W2089144974 on OpenAlexaff
Neda Ehtiati, Benoı̂t Champagne

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital subscriber lineComputer scienceEcho (communications protocol)Robustness (evolution)Single antenna interference cancellationAsynchronous communicationFinite impulse responseImpulse responseAdaptive filterElectronic engineeringAlgorithmTelecommunicationsMathematicsDecoding methodsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In communication systems where full-duplex transmission is required, echo cancellers are deployed to cancel the interference of the transmitted signal at the collocated receiver. For systems using discrete multitone (DMT) modulation, echo cancellation is performed partially in the time and frequency domains to decrease the processing complexity. In this paper, echo cancellation for DMT systems is reformulated as a constrained optimization problem, where a cost function is minimized over an extended linear space. This extended space contains the weights of the finite-impulse-response (FIR) filter emulating the echo channel in the time and the frequency domains, while linear constraints are used to ensure the proper mapping between these two domains. Based on this proposed formulation, a new constrained adaptive echo cancellation structure for DMT-based digital subscriber lines (DSL) systems is proposed. The proposed formulation provides a unifying framework for different practical DSL systems (i.e., frame asynchronous and multirate), as well as additional flexibility in implementation by allowing the incorporation of supplementary constraints that can improve the performance of the system. As an illustrative example, we show how the robustness of the echo canceller can be improved in the presence of radio frequency interference by adding appropriate constraints on the extended linear space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207