MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2089148427 · doi:10.2118/97894-ms

Pore-Level Investigation of Heavy-Oil Depressurisation

2005· article· en· W2089148427 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katayoon Shahabinejad, Ali Danesh, P. Cordelier, G. Hamon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBubble pointPetroleum engineeringSaturation (graph theory)BubbleNucleationWettingOil productionEnhanced oil recoveryMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyChemistryMechanicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bubble nucleation, growth and mobilisation of gas are important phenomena encounter in oil production by the depressurisation process. The drive energy for oil production during pressure depletion is supplied initially by oil expansion but mainly by gas evolution from solution and expansion of reservoir fluids. Some heavy oil reservoirs in Venezuela and Canada show a high recovery factor during primary production under the solution gas drive process. Factors responsible for high oil recovery in heavy oil reservoirs are not well understood to allow reliable predictions to be made for economic evaluation of the process. A series of flow visualisation tests at the pore level was conducted using a high-pressure glass micromodel to identify the key features of the process. A heavy crude oil, with a viscosity of 2500 cp at the bubble point pressure and API of around 10, was used to perform the tests at reservoir conditions. Micromodels with realistic pore pattern and different wettability characteristics, including oil-wet, water-wet and mixed-wet were used in the tests. A series of experiments was performed to study the effect of depletion rate, saturation history and water presence on the nucleation process, gas evolution and hydrocarbon movements. Our observations highlighted the significance of test conditions, particularly saturation history and operational conditions on the nucleation process and bubble formation. Laboratory tests can produce a large number of bubbles formed by pre-existing micro bubbles activation, or a limited number of bubbles due to bulk nucleation, resulting in widely different depressurisation results. Hence, interpretation of laboratory data and its application to field performance would require particular considerations as identified in this study. Critical gas saturation and subsequent gas/oil production are strongly affected by the critical value of supersaturation and the number of bubbles formed during depressurisation. Two generalised correlations have been developed to predict the above parameters at realistic reservoir conditions. The experimental data generated in this study and interpretation of the results provide information on gas nucleation, critical supersaturation, bubble density and critical gas saturation, which are essential in field development planning and estimation of oil and gas recovery by depressurisation. The study also clears a number of ambiguities in the literature on prevailing mechanisms in depletion of heavy oil and contradictions between laboratory and field results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques→French-language works237,207→