MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089163345 · doi:10.2118/145479-ms

The Use of Unmanned Production Buoys to Develop Marginal or Submarginal Stranded Fields or End of Life Hydrocarbon Resources

2011· article· en· W2089163345 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Bone

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuoyResource (disambiguation)Work (physics)EngineeringSubmarine pipelineFossil fuelMarine engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceWaste managementMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper summarises original development work implemented by Ocean Resource into a new type of Unmanned Production Buoy facility, the Sea Producer. This work, which is both comprehensive and wide-ranging, covers the use of autonomous buoy technology to develop various offshore oil and gas production scenarios which would otherwise be uneconomic or indeed impossible. Recently this technology has received considerable interest as it represents, for some smaller developments, possibly the only sensible and economic way forward. Ocean Resource has developed and pioneered the concept over a period of 20 years and is the only company with specific experience and expertise in this complex area. Ocean has operated and maintained its own high stability buoy systems and has completed a number of buoy designs for working buoy systems in use with Apache, Mossgas Pty, Exxon-Mobil and others for oil related operations. More recently Ocean Resource has been responsible for the design of a 5MW Power Buoy for CNR International UK Ltd (Canadian Natural Resources). Unfortunately Monitor Oil PLC, the principle constructor, went into liquidation prior to completion of the project but it is envisaged that this unit, which is 95% complete will shortly be redeployed on another field. The Power Buoy located at Dundee is subject to an option agreement for the purpose. Ocean Resource's low cost autonomous buoy systems represent a game-changing technology that will enable the economic development of hitherto unexploitable or stranded oil and gas reserves. The technology is generally branded as Sea Commander where it relates to field control buoys (a developed product) and Sea Producer where it relates to production. Sea Producer enables a step-change in offshore development expenditure lowering capital costs at the start of project together with greatly reduced operational costs leading to low "through-life" costs for standalone, step-out developments or early production scenarios. Furthermore the relatively minimal nature of the offshore facilities comprising the buoy and storage system leads to rapid deployment and hence faster income and profit return to any offshore project. The unique autonomous buoy technology has been developed by Ocean Resource over a period of 20 years and is an evolution of existing systems. It is therefore both mature and proven. It can be used for sub-sea oil and gas field control, remote pigging, multi-phase pumping, chemical injection, subsea production support and remote flaring. The allied Sea Producer system which is the subject of this paper will be used for full production. Major buoy systems applying Ocean Resource's unique concept are presently operating in a number of oil field geographies, including the East Spar Field Control Buoy, offshore North-West Australia, the Mossgas Field Control Buoy offshore Mossel Bay in the Republic of South Africa and the Zafiro Remote Flare Buoy in Equatorial Guinea. Ocean Resource Buoy systems have been designed to meet the requirements of various international codes and standards and design issues have been reviewed by Lloyds Register, Det Norske Veritas, American Bureau of Shipping, Bureau Veritas and others. Our systems have also been subject to detailed review by the HSE authorities in the UK, Australia, South Africa and Norway. The Sea Producer Unmanned Production Buoy can be applied to the following development scenarios: Early Production Field Extension Marginal Production using Stand-alone Facilities (avoiding costly transit tariffs) End-of-Life Production Enhanced Oil Recovery (Ocean's Sea Sequestor Concept) Field Proving (proving of reserves in proven undeveloped discoveries, PUD's) There is now a clear need for unmanned production buoys with a particularly large gap in the market below, say, 5000 bopd per day production. Current methods including subsea tie-backs and mini FPSO's tend to be economic upwards from 5000 bopd. Sea Producer represents an economic solution to operate through this barrier to develop small accumulations (maybe with single wells), marginal fields, for proving reserves and for tail-end production. For water depths greater than 70 metres there is currently no other economic solution. Figure 1 illustrates the applicability of the system. Ocean's development work has included both actual design and feasibility and pre-feed studies of a number of buoy concepts for most of the oil majors and many of the mid-range developers. An outline is provided of the system, the work that has been completed to demonstrate its viability and provides a preliminary indication of the likely system cost. The length of this paper precludes a full description of the breadth of systems that have been developed but it is worth noting that there is little that can be implemented on a small platform that cannot be carried out on a Sea Producer Unmanned Buoy System.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207