MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089173873 · doi:10.1097/mpa.0b013e3181f7e547

Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Mice Lacking Cellular Prion Protein

2010· article· en· W2089173873 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexander Strom, Gen‐Sheng Wang, Fraser W. Scott

Bibliographic record

VenuePancreas · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyProinsulinGlucose homeostasisInsulinHomeostasisBiologyInsulin resistanceBeta cellIsletMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: We previously demonstrated that the expression of cellular prion protein (PrPC) in islet [beta]-cells is suppressed in hyperglycemic rats suggesting a major role for PrPC in blood glucose regulation. To further characterize the function of PrPC in glucose homeostasis, we studied glucoregulation in PrPC knockout (PrPC KO) mice. METHODS: Glucose tolerance, insulin secretion, and insulin sensitivity were analyzed to assess glucoregulation in Zrch I PrPC KO and the C57BL/6 (control) mice. Immunohistochemistry and morphometry were used to measure [beta]-cell mass. RESULTS: Male PrPC KO mice had significantly increased blood glucose concentration 60, 120, and 180 minutes after intraperitoneal injection of glucose compared with C57BL/6 mice. Female PrPC KO mice showed a less pronounced phenotype of glucose intolerance. Evaluation of [beta]-cell mass, insulin and proinsulin deficiency, and insulin resistance in male mice revealed essentially no difference between PrPC KO and control mice. The only exception was an increase in serum insulin concentration in male PrPC KO mice 5 minutes after glucose injection. CONCLUSIONS: This report is the first to show that PrPC in [beta]-cells is involved in glucoregulation. A further understanding of the role of PrPC in regulating [beta]-cell function will provide valuable insight into the mechanisms of blood glucose regulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePancreasSame topicPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingFrench-language works237,207