MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089180988 · doi:10.1139/b07-015

An altered root exudation pattern through mycorrhization affecting microconidia germination of the highly specialized tomato pathogen <i>Fusarium oxysporum</i> f. sp. <i>lycopersici</i> (<i>Fol</i>) is not tomato specific but also occurs in <i>Fol</i> nonhost plants

2007· article· en· W2089180988 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Stephan Scheffknecht, Marc St‐Arnaud, Thanasan Khaosaad, Siegrid Steinkellner, Horst Vierheilig

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsEspace pour la vie
FundersInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology
KeywordsBiologyFusarium oxysporumGerminationGlomusConidiumFusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersiciFungusBotanyArbuscular mycorrhizaFusariumFusarium wiltSporeSymbiosisBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of root exudates from plants colonized or noncolonized by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae on microconidia germination of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici (Fol) was studied. Root exudates from the Fol-host tomato and root exudates from Fol nonhost plants were tested. Root exudates from all tested plants stimulated microconidia germination. Mycorrhization increased the stimulatory effect exhibited by the root exudates from the Fol host tomato and from all Fol nonhost plants, showing that similar changes occur in the root exudates of all plants after mycorrhization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsFrench-language works237,207