Review: bed sharing between parents and infants exposed to smoke may increase the risk of sudden infant death syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Horsley T, Clifford T, Barrowman N, et al . Benefits and harms associated with the practice of bed sharing: a systematic review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:237–45.[OpenUrl][1][CrossRef][2][PubMed][3][Web of Science][4] Q What are the benefits and harms of children <2 years of age sharing a bed with a parent or other adult? ### ![Graphic][5]</img>Data sources: Medline, CINAHL, HealthSTAR, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library , Turning Research Into Practice database, and Allied and Alternative Medicine (1993 to January 2005). ### ![Graphic][6]</img>Study selection and assessment: English language, case–control and prospective cohort studies that evaluated the practice of bed sharing between adults and children 0–2 years of age. 17 case–control studies (3711 cases and 11 349 controls) and 10 cohort studies (n not reported) met the selection criteria. Quality assessment of individual studies was done using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. ### ![Graphic][7]</img>Outcomes: sudden infant death … [1]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DArchives%2Bof%2BPediatrics%2Band%2BAdolescent%2BMedicine%26rft.stitle%253DArch%2BPediatr%2BAdolesc%2BMed%26rft.aulast%253DHorsley%26rft.auinit1%253DT.%26rft.volume%253D161%26rft.issue%253D3%26rft.spage%253D237%26rft.epage%253D245%26rft.atitle%253DBenefits%2Band%2BHarms%2BAssociated%2BWith%2Bthe%2BPractice%2Bof%2BBed%2BSharing%253A%2BA%2BSystematic%2BReview%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1001%252Farchpedi.161.3.237%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F17339504%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [2]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archpedi.161.3.237&link_type=DOI [3]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=17339504&link_type=MED&atom=%2Febnurs%2F10%2F4%2F119.atom [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000244650300004&link_type=ISI [5]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [6]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif [7]: /embed/inline-graphic-3.gif
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".