Symptomatic Spinal Arachnoid Cysts: Report of Two Cases With Review of the Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Two unusual cases of intradural extramedullary noncommunicating arachnoid cysts are presented, with a review of literature. OBJECTIVE: To assess surgical excision results in the reversal of symptoms and neurologic deficits. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Most patients harboring arachnoid cysts are asymptomatic. Noncommunicating intradural extramedullary arachnoid cysts are more rare than communicating intradural extramedullary cysts. Noncommunicating intradural extramedullary arachnoid cysts are a very rare cause of spinal cord compression. Rarely, these cysts can present with bizarre symptoms, such as angina. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The first case, a 75-year-old woman, presented with progressive paraparesis. The second case, a 40-year-old man, presented with signs and symptoms of angina, with mild spasticity in the lower limbs. In both cases, magnetic resonance imaging revealed compression of the spinal cord as the etiology of presentation. The first patient is the second oldest patient in the literature with an idiopathic spinal arachnoid cyst. The second case has an unusual presentation that has not previously been reported in the literature. RESULTS: Both cases underwent surgical excision of the arachnoid cyst, with resolution of symptoms and reversal of neurologic deficit. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience indicates that complete recovery from an arachnoid cyst is possible after surgical excision, even when symptoms are present for a long duration, even in the elderly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".