MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089204380 · doi:10.3905/jwm.2013.16.3.122

Twenty Recommendations to Reduce Financial Predationand Blind Trust in Small Family-Owned FinancialBusinesses

2013· article· en· W2089204380 on OpenAlexaff
Olivier Mesly

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œjournal of wealth management · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFamily Business Performance and Succession
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessLoomingEmpathyFinanceFinancial servicesFinancial marketPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines the functioning of small family-owned financial businesses under the angle of the consolidated model of financial predation (CMFP). According to this model, small businesses that handle financial services run the risk of attracting investors who will trust them blindly based on such factors as empathy and family ties rather than on sound economic decisions. On the other hand, as proven by recent real-life examples, some family businesses may take advantage of blind trust to earn money in insidious ways that lure vulnerable customers. The author offers 20 recommendations to reduce so-called predation and examines the looming dangers of investors who blindly trust their advisors. <b>TOPICS:</b>Wealth management, in wealth management, risk management

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œjournal of wealth managementSame topicFamily Business Performance and SuccessionFrench-language works237,207