Repeated-batch production of glucoamylase using recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized in a fibrous bed bioreactor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain C468/pGAC9 has an unstable hybrid plasmid pGAC9, which directs production of glucoamylase. A fibrous cotton material with a good adsorption capability for recombinant S. cerevisiae cells was used as the immobilization matrix in an internal loop airlift-driven fibrous bed bioreactor (ILALFBB) system. With batch cultures in the ILALFBB, the fraction of plasmid-carrying cells was 72% after more than 2 days cultivation, which was two times higher than that in the conventional free-cell culture. Correspondingly, a high activity of glucoamylase (GA; 113 U/l) was achieved with a high productivity of 43 U/l/h. The ILALFBB system also maintained a high fraction of viable plasmid-carrying of 74% for glucoamylase production during repeated-batch cultures, achieving a high glucoamylase activity of 140 U/l with a productivity of 19-130 U/l/h in all 14 batches studied during 19.8 days. The stable and long-term glucoamylase production from the ILALFBB was attributed to the effect of cell immobilization on plasmid stability. Plasmid-carrying cells were preferentially retained in the fibrous matrix because of their ability to adhere to the fiber surface and to form cell aggregates higher than those of plasmid-free cells. The repeated batch using immobilized cell of recombinant S. cerevisiae in the ALALFBB system thus provides a feasible method for stable, long-term and high-level production of glucoamylase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".