Stability of the B cell antigen receptor modulates its signaling and antigen-targeting functions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The binding of antigens to the B cell antigen receptor (BCR) results in the initiation of signaling cascades and the internalization of the antigens for processing and presentation. Recent studies indicate that antigen binding destabilizes the BCR as a mechanism to down-regulate B cell responses. Two point mutations in the transmembrane domain of murine membrane IgM (mIgM) (YS to VV) weaken the interaction of mIgM with Igalpha/Igbeta heterodimer, resulting in a destabilized BCR. Using muYS/VV BCR, effects of the destabilized BCR on the functions of an endogenous wild-type mIgG(2a) BCR were analyzed. The muYS/VV BCR is defective in signaling and does not target antigens to late endocytic compartments for processing and presentation. Coligation of the muYS/VV BCR with the endogenous BCR interferes with antigen-targeting functions of the endogenous BCR. Thus, the destabilized BCR has a dominant effect, down-regulating the function of stable wild-type BCR. The ability of the destabilized BCR to influence the stable BCR may play an important role in turning off B cell responses for antigen-driven anergy and tolerance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".