MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhanced susceptibility of seawater cultured rainbow trout, <i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i> (Walbaum), to the microsporidian <i>Loma salmonae</i> during a primary infection with the sea louse, <i>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</i>

2000· article· en· W2089225482 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ahmed Mustafa, David J. Speare, J Daley, Gary Conboy, John F. Burka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fish Diseases · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicAquaculture disease management and microbiota
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRainbow troutBiologyFish <Actinopterygii>FisheryZoologyVeterinary medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal of Fish DiseasesVolume 23, Issue 5 p. 337-341 Enhanced susceptibility of seawater cultured rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), to the microsporidian Loma salmonae during a primary infection with the sea louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis A Mustafa, A Mustafa Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorD J Speare, D J Speare Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorJ Daley, J Daley Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorG A Conboy, G A Conboy Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorJ F Burka, J F Burka Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, CanadaSearch for more papers by this author A Mustafa, A Mustafa Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorD J Speare, D J Speare Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorJ Daley, J Daley Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorG A Conboy, G A Conboy Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorJ F Burka, J F Burka Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, CanadaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 24 December 2001 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2761.2000.00235.xCitations: 20 David J Speare, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, Canada, C1A 4P3 (e-mail: speare@upei.ca) Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume23, Issue5September 2000Pages 337-341 RelatedInformation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fish DiseasesSame topicAquaculture disease management and microbiotaFrench-language works237,207