Connectivity of Cognitive Device-to-Device Communications Underlying Cellular Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Providing direct communications among a rapidly growing number of wireless devices within the coverage area of a cellular system is an attractive way of exploiting the proximity among them to enhance coverage and spectral and energy efficiency. However, such device-to-device (D2D) communications create a new type of interference in cellular systems, calling for rigorous system analysis and design to both protect mobile users (MUs) and guarantee the connectivity of devices. Motivated by the potential advantages of cognitive radio (CR) technology in detecting and exploiting underutilized spectrum, we investigate CR-assisted D2D communications in a cellular network as a viable solution for D2D communications, in which devices access the network with mixed overlay-underlay spectrum sharing. Our comprehensive analysis reveals several engineering insights useful to system design. We first derive bounds of pivotal performance metrics. For a given collision probability constraint, as the prime spectrum-sharing criterion, we also derive the maximum allowable density of devices. This captures the density of MUs and that of active macro base stations. Limited in spatial density, devices may not have connectivity among them. Nevertheless, it is shown that for the derived maximum allowable density, one should judiciously push a portion of devices into receiving mode in order to preserve the connectivity and to keep the isolation probability low. Furthermore, upper bounds on the cellular coverage probability are obtained incorporating load-based power allocation for both path-loss and fading-based cell association mechanisms, which are fairly accurate and consistent with our in-depth simulation results. Finally, implementation issues are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".