Interleukin-4 and interleukin-10 polymorphisms and antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity in Chinese population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Evidence demonstrates that the delicate balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines determines the further progress to severe injury or recovery. Therefore, understanding which cytokines are associated with the development of drug-induced hepatotoxicity (DIH) might guide the prevention and therapeutic direction. Some polymorphisms of cytokine genes have been reported to be associated with DIH involving interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-10 (IL-10) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α); however, these studies are still scanty with inconsistent results. In addition, most of these associations have not been investigated in antituberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity (ATDH) patients with the exception of TNF-α polymorphisms. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between IL-4 and IL-10 gene polymorphisms with the risk of ATDH in a Chinese population. METHODS: The study was designed as a nested case-control study within a prospective cohort. Each case was matched with four controls by sex, age at baseline (±5 years), treatment history, disease severity, drug dosage and place of sample collection. Genetic polymorphisms of IL-4 and IL-10 were determined by TaqMan single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping assay. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was estimated by conditional logistic regression model. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 89 incident ATDH cases and 356 controls undergoing antituberculosis treatment were included. Six SNPs were selected for genotyping, which were rs2243289, rs2243250 and rs2070874 for IL-4, and rs1800896, rs1800871 and rs1800872 for IL-10. No significant difference was observed in genotypes frequencies of the six selected SNPs between case and control group, and the distributions of IL-4 and IL-10 haplotypes were similar in ATDH patients and controls. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: This study is the first attempt to evaluate the associations of genetic polymorphisms of IL-4 and IL-10 genes with ATDH using a nested case-control study design. We provide preliminary evidence that there is no statistically significant association between IL-4 and IL-10 genotypes/haplotypes and the risk of ATDH in Chinese population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".