Plasma <i>β</i>‐amyloid and duration of Alzheimer's disease in adults with Down syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relation of plasma levels of Abeta peptides (Abeta1-40 and Abeta1-42) and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype to dementia status, and the duration of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in adults with Down syndrome (DS). METHODS: Adults with DS were recruited from community settings and followed up for a mean period of 6.7 years. Plasma levels Abeta1-40 and Abeta1-42 and APOE genotype were determined at the last visit. RESULTS: There were 83 nondemented participants and 44 participants with prevalent AD. Overall, plasma levels of Abeta1-42, Abeta1-40 and the ratio Abeta1-42/Abeta1-40 did not differ significantly between the adults with DS. Among demented participants, the mean level of Abeta1-40 was significantly lower (157.0 vs. 195.3) and the ratio of Abeta1-42/Abeta1-40 was significantly higher (0.28 vs. 0.16) in those with more than 4 years duration of dementia than in those with 4 or fewer years' duration of dementia. This pattern was generally similar in those with and without an APOE epsilon4 allele. CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between plasma Abeta peptide levels and the duration of AD in older persons with DS. The predictive and diagnostic roles of Abeta1-42 and Abeta1-40 measurements for AD, however, remain controversial. Change in Abeta peptide levels with onset of AD and with the duration of dementia may account for a lack of difference between prevalent cases and nondemented individuals and for variation in the predictive power of Abeta peptide levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".