MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089272090 · doi:10.2307/2672099

Institutions, Incentives and Economic Reforms in India.

2001· article· en· W2089272090 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stephen D. McDowell

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Affairs · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicIndian Economic and Social Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncentiveEconomic reformEconomic policyEconomic systemDevelopment economicsEconomicsBusinessPolitical scienceMarket economyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PART ONE: POLITICAL ECONOMY OF REFORM India Fiscal Federalism - Kenneth Kletzer and Nirvikar Singh Political Economy and Issues for Reform Fragmented Legislatures and Electoral Systems - Bhaskar Dutta The Indian Experience The Political Economy of Privatisation in India - Anand Gupta Centre-state Relations in India and Brazil - Leslie Elliot Armijo Privatisation of Electricity and Banking PART TWO: FISCAL REFORM Reforming Indian Income Tax Enforcement - Arindam Das-Gupta and Dilip Mookherjee Fiscal Adjustment and the Role of State Governments in India - M. Govinda Rao Tax Amnesties in India - Arindam Das-Gupta and Dilip Mookherjee An Empirical Evaluation PART THREE: REFORMING PUBLIC GOODS DELIVERY The Health and Medical Sector in India - Anil Deolalikar and Prem Vashishtha Potential Reforms and Problems Fertility, Literacy, and the Institution of Child Labour - Mukesh Eswaran PART FOUR: AGRICULTURAL PARASTATALS AND RURAL GOVERNANCE The Food Corporation in India - Ashok Gulati, Pradeep Sharma and Satu Kahkonen Successes and Failures in Indian Foodgrain Marketing Economic Reforms and Agricultural Parastatals - Ashok Gulati and Sangeeta Shroff The Case of the Cotton Corporation in India and Maharashtra Federation Panchayati Raj in India - Chandrika Gulati Problems and Prospects PART FIVE: REFORMING THE INDUSTRIAL AND FINANCIAL STRUCTURE Regulation and Reform of the Financial Sector in India - Pradeep Agrawal An Analysis of the Underlying Incentives Labour Markets as Social Institutions in India - Mrinal Datta-Chaudhuri Labour Policies, Employment and Worker Earnings - Pradeep Agrawal Indian and International Experiences

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePacific AffairsSame topicIndian Economic and Social DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207