Design and Dynamical Analysis of a SAR Membrane Antenna Deployable Structure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Large deployable membrane antennas for Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) satellites have attracted much attention for their low mass, high packaging efficiency, and low fabrication cost. An extendible support structure (ESS) could be used to deploy and support a multi-layer membrane antenna in a precise configuration once it is deployed on orbit. In this paper, an ESS for a membrane antenna with several foldable frames is designed. The ESS can be synchronously deployed by a six-bar-linkage mechanism and several closed-cable loops. A kinematical model of the deployable mechanism is developed to obtain the optimal design of the mechanism for a goal of all foldable frames locked in a same plane after they are fully deployed. A dynamic model of the ESS is developed to investigate its dynamical performance. The goal of the simulation is to compare the dynamic performances of the ESS when the frames are regarded as rigid and flexible. The simulation results are obtained with symbolic dynamic analysis software DynaFlexPro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it