MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Honoring Living Legends

2003· article· en· W2089290665 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tofy Mussivand

Bibliographic record

VenueArtificial Organs · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonorVisionSession (web analytics)TransplantationOrgan transplantationMedicineLibrary scienceHistoryEnvironmental ethicsGerontologySociologySurgeryAnthropologyComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From August 17 to 19, 2001, the University of Ottawa Heart Institute hosted the 6th Symposium of the World Artificial-Organ, Immunology and Transplantation Society (WAITS 2001). During WAITS 2001 a very special session entitled "Living Legends-Lessons Learned and Future Visions" was held. This session brought together giants in the field who had pioneered organ transplantation, cardiovascular surgery, pacemakers, and artificial hearts, among many other major contributions. The purpose of the session was to both honor and learn from those who have contributed greatly to the major scientific and technological advances in our field during the twentieth century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArtificial OrgansSame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207