MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2089306343 · doi:10.1063/1.3056157

Crystal structure and magnetic transition of MnFePGe compound prepared by spark plasma sintering

2009· article· en· W2089306343 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Yue, Z. Q. Li, X. L. Wang, D. M. Liu, J. X. Zhang, Xubo Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpark plasma sinteringMaterials scienceCurie temperatureMagnetic refrigerationCrystal structureCrystallographyPhase transitionStoichiometryMagnetizationMagnetic fieldMagnetic hysteresisCondensed matter physicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)SinteringChemistryMetallurgyFerromagnetismPhysical chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystal structure and magnetic transition were studied for the bulk Mn1.1Fe0.9P0.8Ge0.2 compound prepared by a simple blending and subsequent spark plasma sintering route. X-ray diffraction analysis and refinement show that the compound crystallizes in the hexagonal Fe2P-type structure, in which the Mn atoms occupy all the 3g sites and some 3f sites, the Fe atoms occupy the rest of the 3f sites, and P and the Ge atoms randomly occupy the 2c and 1b sites. Magnetic measurement indicates that the Curie temperature TC is at 253K and the thermal hysteresis of M-T curves at TC upon heating and cooling, a signature of a first-order magnetic phase transition, is about 15K. The maximum magnetic entropy change of the compound reaches as high as 49.2J∕kgK in a field change from 0to5T at 253K, while the adiabatic temperature change of the compound reaches only 1.2K in a field change from 0to1.5T at the same temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materialsFrench-language works237,207